Lagging on the green and just path: Why United States companies need to learn from Europe in ESG and sustainability

Share this post
Lagging on the green and just path: Why United States companies need to learn from Europe in ESG and sustainability

The call for environmental, social and governance (ESG) responsibility is growing globally.But while Europe marches confidently towards ambitious sustainability goals, setting robust standards and regulations for businesses to adapt to, the American landscape remains fragmented, marked by tepid regulations and voluntary initiatives. This is causing United States companies to lag behind their European counterparts when it comes to ESG.

Why is this so? What has Europe done right that the United States seems to be missing? More importantly, can American companies learn from their transatlantic peers and bridge the sustainability gap?

Regulation vs recommendation: the power of clear frameworks

One of the fundamental differences lies in the regulatory landscape. Europe has spearheaded the development of comprehensive ESG frameworks, most notably the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). These directives mandate standardised ESG reporting for large companies, requiring them to disclose their environmental impact, social policies and governance practices.

The lack of similar mandatory reporting requirements in the United States leaves companies to define their own ESG metrics and goals, often resulting in inconsistencies and greenwashing. This opacity makes it difficult for investors and stakeholders to compare companies and assess their true commitment to sustainability.

Targeting progress with concrete rules

While disclosure is crucial, it's just the first step. Europe goes beyond by setting ambitious climate targets and implementing regulations addressing specific sustainability challenges. For example, the European Union’s Taxonomy on Sustainable Activities defines which economic activities can be considered ‘green’ in the context of Europe's environmental goals. Such clear guidelines incentivise companies to invest in genuinely sustainable initiatives instead of using greenwashing tactics.

In contrast, the regulatory landscape in the United States regarding sustainability remains patchwork and often reactive. While individual states like California have adopted ambitious climate targets, there's no national mandate, leaving companies uncertain and hesitant to make long-term investments in sustainable practices.

The social side of sustainability

Europe's ESG focus extends beyond environmental concerns, embracing a broader vision of social responsibility. The European Union Action Plan on Sustainable Finance, for instance, emphasises social factors like employee rights, diversity and inclusion, and community engagement. This holistic approach ensures that companies contribute to building a greenerworld that is also just and equitable.

In the United States, while social issues are increasingly gaining traction within the ESG realm, there's still a long way to go. Issues like income inequality, racial injustice and access to healthcare remain pressing concerns, and American companies often fall short ofaddressing them comprehensively within their ESG strategies.

Embracing the European model

The answer to bridging the sustainability gap is not blind imitation but thoughtful adaptation. United States companies can learn from Europe's successes by:

• advocating for national ESG regulations – pushing for a standardised framework for ESG reporting and disclosure would create a level playing field, incentivise sustainable practices and enhance transparency

• adopting ambitious sustainability goals – setting concrete targets for carbon reduction, resource efficiency and social responsibility would demonstrate genuine commitment and drive innovation

• integrating social issues into ESG strategies – addressing diversity and inclusion, employee wellbeing and community engagement alongside environmental concerns would create a more holistic approach to sustainability

• embracing collaboration – learning from European counterparts and collaborating on international sustainability initiatives would foster knowledge sharing and accelerate progress.

Transitioning to a sustainable future requires collective action, and United States companies cannot afford to be bystanders. By embracing the lessons learned from Europe's leadership in ESG and sustainability, American businesses can catch up and even become global leaders in building a greener, more just and prosperous future.

Remember, sustainability is not a spectator sport – it's a demanding race, and at the finish line is a planet worth living on. It's time for United States companies to stop hesitating and learn from Europe. We need a future where profit and planet, prosperity and people, go hand in hand. The time for action is now, and the world is watching.

Share this post